Close Menu
healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Monsoon Self-Care Has Changed And Homegrown Beauty Brands Are Leading The Way

    July 23, 2026

    Over the last three months, 8% of Americans first turned to AI for health information or advice

    July 23, 2026

    Building The Next Generation Of Behavioral Health Platforms

    July 23, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Monsoon Self-Care Has Changed And Homegrown Beauty Brands Are Leading The Way
    • Over the last three months, 8% of Americans first turned to AI for health information or advice
    • Building The Next Generation Of Behavioral Health Platforms
    • Weight loss drugs increase the risk of hair loss
    • Kyrgyzstan Urges Citizens in Russia to Exercise Caution Following Drone Attacks on Wildberries Warehouses
    • American Nutrition Association backs finger
    • FDA reviews peptide injections favored by RFK Jr. and wellness influencers
    • FDA to review 7 popular peptides touted for weight loss, healing and longevity
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com
    • Home
    • Fitness
    • Health
    • Nutrition
    • Lifestyle
    • Conditions
    • Mental Health
    • Weight Loss
    • Wellness Tips
    Thursday, July 23
    healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com
    Home»Nutrition»Youth lead current dietary emissions while seniors increasingly drive total emission growth
    Nutrition

    Youth lead current dietary emissions while seniors increasingly drive total emission growth

    healthylife7By healthylife7July 23, 2026No Comments16 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Youth lead current dietary emissions while seniors increasingly drive total emission growth
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    Abstract

    Diets across age groups vary in both nutritional quality and greenhouse gas emissions, yet their relationship remains poorly understood in the context of population aging and evolving dietary patterns. We evaluated dietary emissions associated with 141 products across 22 age groups in 149 countries from 2000 to 2019, combining age-specific dietary intake from the Global Dietary Database with a consumption-based emission inventory derived from FAOSTAT. We quantified changes in emissions alongside shifts in nutritional quality and examined contributions of demographic and dietary factors. Adolescents and young adults generally had the highest per capita dietary emissions, while seniors contributed most to global emission growth, particularly in high- and upper-middle-income countries. Increased meat intake was a leading contributor to rising emissions and frequently coincided with declining nutritional quality. These findings highlight the need for dietary-emission mitigation efforts across age groups that account for demographic shifts, nutritional needs and national development contexts.

    Access through your institution
    Buy or subscribe

    This is a preview of subscription content, access

    Access options

    Access through your institution

    • Purchase on SpringerLink
    • Instant access to the full article PDF.

    39,95 €

    Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

    Fig. 1: Per capita dietary GHG emissions and their composition by food categories for different age groups in 18 regions in 2000 and 2019.
    Fig. 2: Net changes in per capita dietary GHG emissions between 2000 and 2019 categorized by shifts in nutritional quality for different age groups.
    Fig. 3: Contributions of different age groups to global and regional total dietary GHG emissions from 2000 to 2019.
    Fig. 4: Contributions of six driving factors to changes in global and regional dietary GHG emissions for different age groups from 2000 to 2019.
    Fig. 5: World regions used in this study.

    Data availability

    Data for emissions from agricultural land use and land use change, on-farm agricultural production and post-farm processes, and for physical food consumption, are curated by the FAO and can be freely obtained from FAOSTAT63, available from ref. 20. Data on food loss and waste rate are retrieved from FAOSTAT63 and ref. 18. Dietary intake data for different food categories by age are obtained from the GDD1,8,17. Population data used in this study are obtained from the World Population Prospects of the United Nations66. Supplementary figures and tables used in the analysis can be found in the Supplementary Information files. Supplementary datasets supporting the analyses of this study are provided with the paper. Additional detailed results are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

    Code availability

    The code developed for data processing in R is provided as Supplementary Code files

    References

    1. Miller, V. et al. Global dietary quality in 185 countries from 1990 to 2018 show wide differences by nation, age, education, and urbanicity. Nat. Food3, 694–702 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    2. Leng, G. et al. The determinants of food choice. Proc. Nutr. Soc.76, 316–327 (2017)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    3. Laine, J. E. et al. Co-benefits from sustainable dietary shifts for population and environmental health: an assessment from a large European cohort study. Lancet Planet. Health5, e786–e796 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    4. He, P., Feng, K., Baiocchi, G., Sun, L. & Hubacek, K. Shifts towards healthy diets in the US can reduce environmental impacts but would be unaffordable for poorer minorities. Nat. Food2, 664–672 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    5. Hiç, C., Pradhan, P., Rybski, D. & Kropp, J. R. P. Food surplus and its climate burdens. Environ. Sci. Technol.50, 4269–4277 (2016)

      Article 
      ADS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    6. Yin, K., Zhao, X., Liu, Y., Zhu, J. & Fei, X. Aging increases global annual food greenhouse gas emissions up to 300 million tonnes by 2100. Environ. Sci. Technol.58, 5784–5795 (2024)

      Article 
      ADS 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    7. Shigetomi, Y., Ishigami, A., Long, Y. & Chapman, A. Curbing household food waste and associated climate change impacts in an ageing society. Nat. Commun.15, 8806 (2024)

      Article 
      ADS 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    8. Miller, V. et al. Global, regional, and national consumption of animal-y Database. Lancet Planet. Health6, e243–e256 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    9. Lara-Castor, L. et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage intakes among adults between 1990 and 2018 in 185 countries. Nat. Commun.14, 5957 (2023)

      Article 
      ADS 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    10. He, P., Baiocchi, G., Hubacek, K., Feng, K. & Yu, Y. The environmental impacts of rapidly changing diets and their nutritional quality in China. Nat. Sustain.1, 122–127 (2018)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    11. He, P. et al. Health–environment efficiency of diets shows nonlinear trends over 1990–2011. Nat. Food5, 116–124 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    12. Guo, Y. et al. Environmental and human health trade-offs in potential Chinese dietary shifts. One Earth5, 268–282 (2022)

      Article 
      ADS 
      Google Scholar 

    13. Zheng, H. et al. Ageing society in developed countries challenges carbon mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change12, 241–248 (2022)

      Article 
      ADS 
      CAS 
      Google Scholar 

    14. Wang, Q., Kwan, M.-P., Lin, J. & Dang, N. The impacts of population aging on residential energy consumption and carbon emissions in the United States. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun.12, 1741 (2025)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    15. Tang, L. et al. Assessing the impacts of fertility and retirement policies on China’s carbon emissions. Nat. Clim. Change14, 1261–1267 (2024)

      Article 
      ADS 
      Google Scholar 

    16. Supply Utilization Accounts, Food Balances. FAOSTAT Online Database (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022); https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/SCL

    17. Miller, V., Webb, P., Micha, R. & Mozaffarian, D. Defining diet quality: a synthesis of dietary quality metrics and their validity for the double burden of malnutrition. Lancet Planet. Health4, e352–e370 (2020)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    18. Tuninetti, M., Ridolfi, L. & Laio, F. Compliance with EAT–Lancet dietary guidelines would reduce global water footprint but increase it for 40% of the world population. Nat. Food3, 143–151 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    19. Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Van Otterdijk, R. & Meybeck, A. Global Food Losses and Food Waste—Extent, Causes and Prevention (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2011); https://www.fao.org/3/mb060e/mb060e00.htm

    20. Li, Y. et al. Changes in global food consumption increase GHG emissions despite efficiency gains along global supply chains. Nat. Food4, 483–495 (2023)

    21. Li, Y. et al. Reducing climate change impacts from the global food system through diet shifts. Nat. Clim. Change14, 943–953 (2024)

    22. Götmark, F., Cafaro, P. & O’Sullivan, J. Aging human populations: good for us, good for the earth. Trends Ecol. Evol.33, 851–862 (2018)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    23. Scott, A. J. The longevity society. Lancet Healthy Longev.2, e820–e827 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    24. Bongaarts, J. & O’Neill, B. C. Global warming policy: is population left out in the cold?. Science361, 650–652 (2018)

      Article 
      ADS 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    25. Gu, D., Andreev, K. & Dupre, M. E. Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Wkly.3, 604–613 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    26. Teggart, K. et al. Group-based nutrition interventions to promote healthy eating and mobility in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr.25, 2920–2951 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    27. Saffel-Shrier, S., Johnson, M. A. & Francis, S. L. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior: food and nutrition programs for community-residing older adults. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav.51, 781–797 (2019)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    28. Realini, C. E. et al. Meat insights: Uruguayan consumers’ mental associations and motives underlying consumption changes. Meat Sci.192, 108901 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    29. Habumugisha, T. et al. Older adults’ perceptions about meat consumption: a qualitative study in Gasabo district, Kigali, Rwanda. BMC Public Health24, 1515 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    30. Hurree, N. & Jeewon, R. An analysis of contributors to energy intake among middle aged and elderly adults. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. J.4, 8–18 (2016)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    31. Gorski, I., Chung, W.-C., Herr, K. & Mehta, K. Nyama choma culture: implications of increased red meat and alcohol consumption in East Africa. J. Sustain. Dev.9, 96–102 (2016)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    32. Cornelsen, L. et al. Cross-sectional study of drivers of animal-. BMC Nutr.2, 70 (2016)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    33. Vranken, L., Avermaete, T., Petalios, D. & Mathijs, E. Curbing global meat consumption: emerging evidence of a second nutrition transition. Environ. Sci. Policy39, 95–106 (2014)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    34. Oostindjer, M. et al. Are school meals aainability of children’s diet and food consumption? A cross-national comparative perspective. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.57, 3942–3958 (2017)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    35. Carducci, B. et al. Gaps and priorities in assessment of food environments for children and adolescents in low-and middle-income countries. Nat. Food2, 396–403 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    36. Ochola, S. & Masibo, P. K. Dietary intake of school children and adolescents in developing countries. Ann. Nutr. Metab.64, 24–40 (2014)

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    37. HLPE. Nutrition and Food Systems. A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security (FAO, 2017); https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/i7846e

    38. 2018GlobalNutrition Report: Shining a Light to Spur Action on Nutrition (Development Initiatives, 2018); https://globalnutritionreport.org/reports/global-nutrition-report-2018/

    39. Food Systems and Diets: Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century (Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition, 2016); https://glopan.org/sites/default/files/ForesightReport.pdf

    40. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP & WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025—Addressing High Food Price Inflation for Food Security and Nutrition (FAO, 2025); https://doi.org/10.4060/cd6008en

    41. Pradhan, P., Fischer, G., Van Velthuizen, H., Reusser, D. E. & Kropp, J. P. Closing yield gaps: how sustainable can we be? PloS ONE10, e0129487 (2015)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    42. Sibhatu, K. T. & Qaim, M. Rural food security, subsistence agriculture, and seasonality. PloS ONE12, e0186406 (2017)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    43. Navarre, N., Schrama, M., de Vos, C. & Mogollón, J. M. Interventions for sourcing EAT-Lancet diets within national agricultural areas: a global analysis. One Earth6, 31–40 (2023)

      Article 
      ADS 
      Google Scholar 

    44. Geyik, O., Hadjikakou, M., Karapinar, B. & Bryan, B. A. Does global food trade close the dietary nutrient gap for the world’s poorest nations? Glob. Food Secur.28, 100490 (2021)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    45. Hirvonen, K., Bai, Y., Headey, D. & Masters, W. A. Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. Lancet Glob. Health8, e59–e66 (2020)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    46. Springmann, M., Clark, M. A., Rayner, M., Scarborough, P. & Webb, P. The global and regional costs of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health5, e797–e807 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    47. Hong, C. et al. Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961–2017. Nature589, 554–561 (2021)

      Article 
      ADS 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    48. Hong, C. et al. Land-use emissions embodied in international trade. Science376, 597–603 (2022)

      Article 
      ADS 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    49. Kastner, T., Erb, K.-H. & Haberl, H. Rapid growth in agricultural trade: effects on global area efficiency and the role of management. Environ. Res. Lett.9, 034015 (2014)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    50. Henders, S., Persson, U. M. & Kastner, T. Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environ. Res. Lett.10, 125012 (2015)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    51. Miller, V. et al. Global Dietary Database 2017: data availability and gaps on 54 major foods, beverages and nutrients among 5.6 million children and adults from 1220 surveys worldwide. BMJ Glob. Health6, e003585 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    52. Chiuve, S. E. et al. Alternative dietary indices both strongly predict risk of chronic disease. J. Nutr.142, 1009–1018 (2012)

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    53. Developing the Healthy Eating Index (National Institutes of Health, 2020); https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/hei/developing.html#2015

    54. Shams-White, M. M. et al. Healthy eating index—2020: review and update process to reflect the dietary guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.123, 1280–1288 (2023)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    55. Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet393, 447–492 (2019)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    56. World Bank Country and Lending Groups (World Bank, 2024); https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups

    57. Tubiello, F. N. et al. Pre-and post-production processes increasingly dominate greenhouse gas emissions from agri-food systems. Earth Syst. Sci. Data14, 1795–1809 (2022)

      Article 
      ADS 
      Google Scholar 

    58. Barrett, J. et al. Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study. Clim. Policy13, 451–470 (2013)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    59. Liu, Z. et al. Four system boundaries for carbon accounts. Ecol. Model.318, 118–125 (2015)

      Article 
      CAS 
      Google Scholar 

    60. Kastner, T., Kastner, M. & Nonhebel, S. Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective. Ecol. Econ.70, 1032–1040 (2011)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    61. Food Balance Sheets—A Handbook (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2001); https://www.fao.org/3/x9892e/X9892e05.htm#P8217_125315

    62. Nutritive Factors (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2023); https://www.fao.org/economic/the-statistics-division-ess/publications-studies/publications/nutritive-factors/en/

    63. FAOSTAT Database (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022); https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/

    64. World Population Prospects 2022 (United Nations, 2022); https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/

    65. Kummu, M. et al. Lost food, wasted rehwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci. Total Environ.438, 477–489 (2012)

      Article 
      ADS 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    66. World Population Prospects 2019 (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2019); https://population.un.org/wpp2019/Download/Standard/Population/

    67. Crippa, M. et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Food2, 198–209 (2021)

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    68. Tubiello, F. N. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from food systems: building the evidence base. Environ. Res. Lett.16, 065007 (2021)

      Article 
      CAS 
      Google Scholar 

    69. Krebs-Smith, S. M. et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.118, 1591–1602 (2018)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    70. Schwingshackl, L. & Hoffmann, G. Diet quality as assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score, and health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.115, 780–800.e785 (2015)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    71. Guenther, P. M., Reedy, J. & Krebs-Smith, S. M. Development of the healthy eating index—2005. J. Am. Diet. Assoc.108, 1896–1901 (2008)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    72. Ang, B. W., Zhang, F. Q. & Choi, K.-H. Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition. Energy23, 489–495 (1998)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    73. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2006); https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-national-greenhouse-gas-inventories/

    74. Tubiello, F. N. et al. The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett.8, 015009 (2013)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    75. Tubiello, F. N. et al. Methods for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Food Systems. Part III: Energy Use in Fertilizer Manufacturing, Food Processing, Packaging, Retail and Household Consumption (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2021); https://doi.org/10.4060/cb7473en

    Download references

    Acknowledgements

    We thank the Global Dietary Database (GDD) team for their assistance and guidance regarding data access and use during the early stages of this study

    Funding

    Y.L. discloses support for this study from the New Chongqing YC Project (grant number CSTB2025YCJH-KYXM0032), funded by the Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology, and the Chongqing University Hongshen Start-up Grant. Y.S. discloses support for this study from the Horizon Europe Project EU-CHINA-BRIDGE (grant number 101137971), supported by UKRI grant 10132630 at the University of Birmingham. K.H. discloses support for this study from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme Project PANTHEON (grant number 101137905). P.P. discloses support for this study from the European Research Council (ERC) Project BeyondSDG (grant number 101077492). Y.L. and J.Y. acknowledge support from the China Scholarship Council PhD Program. P.H., S.F. and F.R. declare no relevant funding.

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region’s Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

      Yanxian Li

    2. College of Environment and Ecology, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

      Yanxian Li

    3. Fudan Tyndall Center and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Air Quality and Environmental Health, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

      Jin Yan

    4. Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

      Pan He

    5. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

      Pan He

    6. Integrated Research on Energy, Environment and Society (IREES), Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen (ESRIG), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

      Prajal Pradhan, Franco Ruzzenenti & Klaus Hubacek

    7. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany

      Prajal Pradhan

    8. Business School, Soochow University, Suzhou, China

      Shuai Fang

    9. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

      Yuli Shan

    Authors

    1. Yanxian LiView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Jin YanView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Pan HeView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Prajal PradhanView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Shuai FangView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Yuli ShanView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Franco RuzzenentiView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Klaus HubacekView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    Contributions

    Y.L., Y.S. and K.H. designed the study. Y.L. performed the analysis with support from J.Y., P.H. and S.F. on analytical approaches and visualization. Y.L. took the lead in writing, with contributions from P.H., P.P., F.R. and K.H. Y.S. and K.H. supervised and coordinated the overall study. All co-authors reviewed and commented on the paper

    Ethics declarations

    Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing interests

    Peer review

    Peer review information

    Nature Food thanks Alexander Vonderschmidt, Ke Yin and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work

    Additional information

    Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary Information (download PDF )

    Supplementary Figs. 1–30, Supplementary Tables 1–12, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Discussion

    Reporting Summary (download PDF )

    Supplementary Data 1

    Supplementary datasets containing age-specific dietary emission results and uncertainty ranges analysed in this study

    Supplementary Code 1

    Step-by-step R scripts and README documentation describing the analytical workflow and data-processing procedures

    Source data

    Source Data Fig. 1 (download XLSX )

    Source data for Fig. 1.

    Source Data Fig. 2 (download XLSX )

    Source data for Fig. 2.

    Source Data Fig. 3 (download XLSX )

    Source data for Fig. 3.

    Source Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

    Source data for Fig. 4.

    Rights and permissions

    Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Li, Y., Yan, J., He, P. et al. Youth lead current dietary emissions while seniors increasingly drive total emission growth.
    Nat Food7, 688–700 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01383-4

    • Received:25 June 2025

    • Accepted:05 June 2026

    • Published:22 July 2026

    • Version of record:22 July 2026

    • Issue date:July 2026

    • DOI
      :https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01383-4

    Current dietary emissions lead Youth
    healthylife7
    • Website

    Related Posts

    American Nutrition Association backs finger

    July 23, 2026

    Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon stepped up himself for healthy eating and safe care for children during the v..

    July 23, 2026

    Bama Health Foods reopens with Nourish Grocer now accepting EBT in West Birmingham

    July 23, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Health
    Lifestyle

    Monsoon Self-Care Has Changed And Homegrown Beauty Brands Are Leading The Way

    By healthylife7July 23, 20260

    The Indian monsoon has always demanded a different kind of beauty routine. But this season, the conversation is shifting from simply surviving the humidity to embracing skincare and body care designed specifically for it. Homegrown brands aren’t just responding to the rains,  they’re building products around them, proving that self-care can be as climate-conscious as…

    Over the last three months, 8% of Americans first turned to AI for health information or advice

    July 23, 2026

    Building The Next Generation Of Behavioral Health Platforms

    July 23, 2026

    Weight loss drugs increase the risk of hair loss

    July 23, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Fitness

    Opinion: The FDA must put biotech at its center or continue to cede early research to China

    July 6, 2026

    Inside Elevance’s digital chronic disease management strategy

    July 6, 2026

    Best, Worst States For Well

    July 6, 2026

    What do the Middle Ages tell us about mental health then and now? VCU historian Leigh Ann Craig has answers

    July 6, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us

    Welcome to HealthyLife7.com, your trusted source for reliable health, wellness, fitness, and lifestyle information. Our mission is to help people make informed decisions about their health by providing clear, practical, and easy-to-understand content.

    At HealthyLife7.com, we believe that good health starts with the right knowledge. Whether you're looking for healthy eating tips, fitness advice, mental wellness strategies, weight management guidance, or information about common health conditions, our goal is to deliver valuable content that supports a healthier lifestyle.

    Fitness

    Monsoon Self-Care Has Changed And Homegrown Beauty Brands Are Leading The Way

    July 23, 2026

    Over the last three months, 8% of Americans first turned to AI for health information or advice

    July 23, 2026

    Building The Next Generation Of Behavioral Health Platforms

    July 23, 2026
    Health

    Opinion: The FDA must put biotech at its center or continue to cede early research to China

    July 6, 2026

    Inside Elevance’s digital chronic disease management strategy

    July 6, 2026

    Best, Worst States For Well

    July 6, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 healthylife7.com. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.