Close Menu
healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    GoodHeart | Come Alive aims to bring Clifton boys back home

    July 11, 2026

    The pitfalls of using social media and AI for health decisions, according to a doctor

    July 11, 2026

    UK Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity guidelines

    July 11, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • GoodHeart | Come Alive aims to bring Clifton boys back home
    • The pitfalls of using social media and AI for health decisions, according to a doctor
    • UK Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity guidelines
    • Extension health experts share tips for supporting brain hea…
    • UAMS’ HCOP Academy Prepares Teens for College, Careers in Healthcare
    • Missoula Stampede 2026
    • Better tuberculosis treatment starts with a better test
    • Recognizing Minority Mental Health Awareness Month
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com
    • Home
    • Fitness
    • Health
    • Nutrition
    • Lifestyle
    • Conditions
    • Mental Health
    • Weight Loss
    • Wellness Tips
    Saturday, July 11
    healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com
    Home»Conditions»Large language models exhibit stigmatizing behaviour in contextual judgements of health conditions
    Conditions

    Large language models exhibit stigmatizing behaviour in contextual judgements of health conditions

    stamilhstgr0518@gmail.comBy stamilhstgr0518@gmail.comJuly 6, 2026No Comments15 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Large language models exhibit stigmatizing behaviour in contextual judgements of health conditions
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    Abstract

    Current fairness evaluations of large language models (LLMs) deployed in healthcare settings largely focus on explicit statements about health-related stigma. Here we show that this may overestimate safety by contrasting explicit stigma-scale scores with contextual judgements in 51 scenarios. Across six LLMs and three high-stigma domains (human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and mental health), LLMs scored below the meta-analytic human benchmark on six stigma scales (Nhuman = 56,612). However, in a contextual judgement task with 61,200 model decisions, LLMs showed systematic differences in stigma-congruent judgements across health conditions, with the largest differences observed when mental-health disorders and highly stigmatized physical conditions (HIV/HBV) were compared with healthy baselines. Reasoning-enabled models were associated with smaller health-condition differences. From their reasoning content, we identified transferable prompting strategies that were associated with lower rates of stigma-congruent output in non-reasoning models across languages and scenarios. These findings expose a dissociation in LLM outputs between explicit statements and contextual judgements in the evaluated versions, and argue for context-sensitive audits of LLMs before health deployment.

    Access through your institution
    Buy or subscribe

    This is a preview of subscription content, access

    Access options

    Access through your institution

    • Purchase on SpringerLink
    • Instant access to the full article PDF.

    39,95 €

    Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

    Fig. 1: Evaluation framework for assessing health-related stigma in LLMs.
    Fig. 2: LLM stigma scale scores relative to human benchmarks.
    Fig. 3: Stigma-congruent responses across humans, models, languages, scenarios and health-condition categories in the contextual judgement task.
    Fig. 4: Effects of reasoning mode on stigma-congruent responses across health-condition categories, models and languages.

    Data availability

    The data analysed in this study are available

    Code availability

    The code used in this study is available

    References

    1. Bedi, S. et al. Testing and evaluation of health care applications of large language models: a systematic review. JAMA333, 319–328 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    2. Duan, Z. et al. Multi-center benchmarking of large language models for clinical decision support in lung cancer screening. Cell Rep. Med.6, 102465 (2025)

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    3. Hao, Y. et al. Large language model integrations in cancer decision-making: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit. Med.8, 450 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    4. Ren, Z. et al. Healthcare agent: eliciting the power of large language models for medical consultation. NPJ Artif. Intell.1, 24 (2025)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    5. Pan, A., Musheyev, D., Bockelman, D., Loeb, S. & Kabarriti, A. E. Assessment of artificial intelligence Chatbot responses to top searched queries about cancer. JAMA Oncol.9, 1437–1440 (2023)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    6. Cornelison, B. R., Erstad, B. L. & Edwards, C. Accuracy of a chatbot in answering questions that patients should ask before taking a new medication. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.64, 102110 (2024)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    7. Roldan-Vasquez, E. et al. Reliability of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to frequently asked questions in breast surgical oncology. J. Surg. Oncol.130, 188–203 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    8. Wang, X., Zhou, Y. & Zhou, G. The application and ethical implication of generative AI in mental health: systematic review. JMIR Ment. Health12, e70610 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    9. Wilhelm, T. I., Roos, J. & Kaczmarczyk, R. Large language models for therapy recommendations across 3 clinical specialties: comparative study. J. Med. Internet Res.25, e49324 (2023)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    10. Busch, F. et al. Current applications and challenges in large language models for patient care: a systematic review. Commun. Med.5, 26 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    11. Maity, S. & Saikia, M. J. Large language models in healthcare and medical applications: a review. Bioengineering12, 631 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    12. Tam, T. Y. C. et al. A framework for human evaluation of large language models in healthcare derived from literature review. NPJ Digit. Med.7, 258 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    13. Shiferaw, M. W., Zheng, T., Winter, A., Mike, L. A. & Chan, L.-N. Assessing the accuracy and quality of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot-generated responses in making patient-specific drug-therapy and healthcare-related decisions. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak.24, 404 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    14. Earp, B. D., McLoughlin, K. L., Monrad, J. T., Clark, M. S. & Crockett, M. J. How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments. Nat. Commun.12, 5776 (2021)

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    15. Jin, W. Y. & Peng, M. The effects of social perception on moral judgment. Front. Psychol.11, 557216 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    16. Mårtensson, E. Construal level theory and moral judgments: how thinking abstractly modifies morality. J. Eur. Psychol. Stud.8, 30–40 (2017)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    17. Bartels, D. M., Bauman, C. W., Cushman, F. A., Pizarro, D. A. & McGraw, A. P. in The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (eds Keren, G. & Wu, G.), 478–515 (Wiley, 2015)

    18. Webster, C. S., Taylor, S., Thomas, C. & Weller, J. M. Social bias, discrimination and inequity in healthcare: mechanisms, implications and recommendations. BJA Educ.22, 131–137 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    19. Vela, M. B. et al. Eliminating explicit and implicit biases in health care: evidence and research needs. Annu. Rev. Public Health43, 477–501 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    20. Gopal, D. P., Chetty, U., O’Donnell, P., Gajria, C. & Blackadder-Weinstein, J. Implicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research and decision making. Future Healthc. J.8, 40–48 (2021)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    21. Thirsk, L. M., Panchuk, J. T., Stahlke, S. & Hagtvedt, R. Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses’ judgment and decision-making: a scoping review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud.133, 104284 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    22. Akbari, H., Mohammadi, M. & Hosseini, A. Disease-related stigma, stigmatizers, causes, and consequences: a systematic review. Iran. J. Public Health52, 2042–2054 (2023)

      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    23. Stangl, A. L. et al. The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework: a global, crosscutting framework to inform research, intervention development, and policy on health-related stigmas. BMC Med.17, 31 (2019)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    24. Goldberg, D. S. On stigma & health. J. Law Med. Ethics45, 475–483 (2017)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    25. Zell, C. S., Thorp, S. R. & Thompson, K. J. The Relative Understanding of Stigma about Health (RUSH) study: the role of controllability and knowledge in explaining condition-specific variability. Community Ment. Health J.62, 513–526 (2026)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    26. Bharadwaj, P., Pai, M. M. & Suziedelyte, A. Mental health stigma. Econ. Lett.159, 57–60 (2017)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    27. Scambler, G. Health-related stigma. Sociol. Health Illn.31, 441–455 (2009)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    28. Fauk, N. K., Ward, P. R., Hawke, K. & Mwanri, L. HIV stigma and discrimination: perspectives and personal experiences of healthcare providers in Yogyakarta and Belu, Indonesia. Front. Med.8, 625787 (2021)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    29. Kågström, A. et al. Mental health stigma and its consequences: a systematic scoping review of pathways to discrimination and adverse outcomes. EClinicalMedicine89, 103588 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    30. Earnshaw, V. A. & Quinn, D. M. The impact of stigma in healthcare on people living with chronic illnesses. J. Health Psychol.17, 157–168 (2012)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    31. Rai, S. S., Syurina, E. V., Peters, R. M., Putri, A. I. & Zweekhorst, M. B. Non-communicable diseases-related stigma: a mixed-methods systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17, 6657 (2020)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    32. Lu, Q. et al. The effect of stigma on social participation in community-dwelling Chinese patients with stroke sequelae: a cross-sectional study. Clin. Rehabil.36, 407–414 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    33. Maher, V. & Psych, B. The Impact of Stigma and Social Anxiety on Social Participation in People with Severe Mental Illness (Open Research Newcastle, 2025)

    34. Liu, Y. & Li, Y. Community participation and subjective perception of recovery and quality of life among people with serious mental illnesses: the mediating role of self-stigma. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.60, 1335–1345 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    35. Kaufmann, T., Weng, P., Bengs, V. & Hüllermeier, E. A survey of reinforcement learning from human feedback. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res.https://openreview.net/forum?id=f7OkIurx4b (2025)

    36. Wang, K. et al. A comprehensive survey in LLM (-agent) full stack safety: data, training and deployment. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15585 (2025)

    37. Ji, J. et al. Beavertails: towards improved safety alignment of LLM

      Google Scholar 

    38. Tan, B. C. Z. & Lee, R. K.-W. Unmasking implicit bias: evaluating persona-prompted LLM responses in power-disparate social scenarios. In Proc. 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers) (eds Chiruzzo, L. et al.) 1075–1108 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025)

    39. Kumar, D., Jain, U., Agarwal, S. & Harshangi, P. Investigating implicit bias in large language models: a large-scale study of over 50 LLMs. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12864 (2024)

    40. Majumdar, A., Chen, F., Li, J. & Wang, X. Evaluating LLMs for demographic-targeted social bias detection: a comprehensive benchmark study. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/html/2510.04641v1 (2025)

    41. Bai, X., Wang, A., Sucholutsky, I. & Griffiths, T. L. Explicitly unbiased large language models still form biased associations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA122, e2416228122 (2025)

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    42. Zhao, Y. et al. in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 (eds Che, W. et al.) 1–12 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025)

    43. Dong, X., Wang, Y., Yu, P. S. & Caverlee, J. Probing explicit and implicit gender bias through llm conditional text generation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00306 (2023)

    44. Omar, M. et al. Evaluating and addressing demographic disparities in medical large language models: a systematic review. Int. J. Equity Health24, 57 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    45. Levartovsky, A., Omar, M., Nadkarni, G. N., Kopylov, U. & Klang, E. Sociodemographic bias in large language model–assisted gastroenterology. JAMA Netw. Open8, e2532692 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    46. Criss, S. et al. HIV stigma exists—exploring ChatGPT’s HIV advice by race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities12, 3622–3635 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    47. Heller, U. C., Grant, L. H., Yasui, M. & Keysar, B. Culturally anchored mental-health attitudes: the impact of language. Clin. Psychol. Sci.12, 290–304 (2024)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    48. Gronholm, P. C. et al. Exploring perspectives of stigma and discrimination among people with lived experience of mental health conditions: a co-produced qualitative study. EClinicalMedicine70, 102509 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    49. Ong Zhen Mei, E., Jones, L. & Occhipinti, S. Where there’s smoke, there’s stigma? Written expressions about individuals with lung cancer reveal cultural and language differences. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol.44, 417–440 (2025)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    50. Ren, Y., Wang, S., Fu, X. & Shi, X. A systematic review and meta-analysis of implicit stigma toward people with mental illness among different groups: measurement, extent, and correlates. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag.18, 851–875 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    51. Greenwald, A. G. et al. Implicit-bias remedies: treating discriminatory bias as a public-health problem. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest23, 7–40 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    52. van Beukering, I. E. et al. In what ways does health related stigma affect sustainable employment and well-being at work? A systematic review. J. Occup. Rehabil.32, 365–379 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    53. van Bortel, T. et al. Anticipated and experienced stigma and discrimination in the workplace among individuals with major depressive disorder in 35 countries: qualitative framework analysis of a mixed-method cross-sectional study. BMJ Open14, e077528 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    54. Toumi, M. et al. Experience and impact of stigma in people with chronic hepatitis B: a qualitative study in Asia, Europe, and the United States. BMC Public Health24, 611 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    55. Reeves, S. L., Tse, C., Logel, C. & Spencer, S. J. When seeing stigma creates paternalism: Learning about disadvantage leads to perceptions of incompetence. Group Process. Intergr. Relat.25, 1202–1222 (2022)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    56. Valery, K.-M. et al. How do mental health professionals stigmatize incompetence in schizophrenia? Stig. Health10, 286–292 (2025)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    57. Asrina, A., Ikhtiar, M., Idris, F. P., Adam, A. & Alim, A. Community stigma and discrimination against the incidence of HIV and AIDS. J. Med. Life16, 1327–1334 (2023)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    58. Ajzen, I. & Dasgupta, N. in The Sense of Agency (eds Haggard, P. & Eitam, B.) 115–144 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015)

    59. Killen, M., McGlothlin, H. & Henning, A. in Intergroup Attitudes and Relations in Childhood through Adulthood (eds Levy, S. R. & Killen, M.) 126–145 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2008)

    60. Zhao, Y., Zhu, J., Xu, C., Liu, Y. & Li, X. in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025 (eds Che, W. et al.) 24747–24760 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025)

    61. Dorn, R., Kezar, L., Morstatter, F. & Lerman, K. Harmful speech detection by language models exhibits gender-queer dialect bias. In Proc. 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (eds Arnosti, N. et al.) 1–12 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2024)

    62. Dai, S. et al. Bias and unfairness in information retrieval systems: new challenges in the LLM era. In Proc. 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (eds Baeza-Yates, R. & Bonchi, F.) 6437–6447 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2024)

    63. Schomerus, G., Kummetat, J., Angermeyer, M. & Link, B. G. Putting yourself in the shoes of others’–Relatability as a novel measure to explain the difference in stigma toward depression and schizophrenia. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.60, 1883–1893 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    64. Lin, C.-Y. & Tsang, H. W. Stigma, health and well-being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health17, 7615 (2020)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    65. Pearl, R. L. et al. Measuring internalized health-related stigma across health conditions: development and validation of the I-HEARTS Scale. BMC Med.22, 435 (2024)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    66. Vaishnav, M. et al. Stigma towards mental illness in Asian nations and low-and-middle-income countries, and comparison with high-income countries: a literature review and practice implications. Indian J. Psychiatry65, 995–1011 (2023)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    67. Ahmad, S. S. & Koncsol, S. W. Cultural factors influencing mental health stigma: perceptions of mental illness (POMI) in Pakistani emerging adults. Religions13, 401 (2022)

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    68. Jacobs, S. & Quinn, J. Cultural reproduction of mental illness stigma and stereotypes. Soc. Sci. Med.292, 114552 (2022)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    69. Kalichman, S. C. et al. Perceived HIV stigma and HIV testing among men and women in rural Uganda: a population-based study. Lancet HIV7, e817–e824 (2020)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    70. Genberg, B. L. et al. A comparison of HIV/AIDS-related stigma in four countries: negative attitudes and perceived acts of discrimination towards people living with HIV/AIDS. Soc. Sci. Med.68, 2279–2287 (2009)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    71. Li, D. et al. The impact of hepatitis B knowledge and stigma on screening in Canadian Chinese persons. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.26, 597–602 (2012)

      Google Scholar 

    72. Leng, A. et al. Hepatitis B discrimination in everyday life by rural migrant workers in Beijing. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother.12, 1164–1171 (2016)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    73. Taylor, S. M. & Dear, M. J. Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophr. Bull.7, 225–240 (1981)

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    74. Griffiths, K. M., Christensen, H. & Jorm, A. F. Predictors of depression stigma. BMC Psychiatry8, 25 (2008)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    75. Tseriotou, T. et al. Overview of the CLPsych 2025 shared task: capturing mental health dynamics from social media timelines. In Proc. 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych2025) (eds Zirikly, A. et al.) 193–217 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025)

    76. Wang, X., Zhou, Y. & Zhou, G. Unveiling the cognitive burden: the impact of stigma on distorted thinking among individuals living with hepatitis B. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol.25, 100556 (2025)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    77. Matza, L. S. et al. Qualitative thematic analysis of social media data to assess perceptions of route of administration for antiretroviral treatment among people living with HIV. Patient13, 409–422 (2020)

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    Download references

    Acknowledgements

    We thank L. Du and E. Zhang for their valuable assistance with coding and annotating the model-generated responses

    Funding

    This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China under grant no. 21BSH158 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 32271136

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, and Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Peking University, Beijing, China

      Xi Wang & Guangyu Zhou

    2. Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

      Yujia Zhou

    Authors

    1. Xi WangView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Yujia ZhouView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Guangyu ZhouView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    Contributions

    X.W. was responsible for investigation, formal analysis, data interpretation and writing the original draft. Y.Z. conceived and supervised the project, and contributed computational review and editing. G.Z. managed the research process and provided overall methodological guidance

    Ethics declarations

    Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing interests

    Peer review

    Peer review information

    Nature Health thanks Shadi Nourriz, Mahmud Omar, Estelle Smith and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Lorenzo Righetto, in collaboration with the Nature Health team

    Additional information

    Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary Information (download PDF )

    Supplementary Tables 1–45, Fig. 1 and note

    Reporting Summary (download PDF )

    Rights and permissions

    Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Wang, X., Zhou, Y. & Zhou, G. Large language models exhibit stigmatizing behaviour in contextual judgements of health conditions.
    Nat. Health (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44360-026-00164-4

    • Received:23 January 2026

    • Accepted:10 June 2026

    • Published:06 July 2026

    • Version of record:06 July 2026

    • DOI
      :https://doi.org/10.1038/s44360-026-00164-4

    exhibit language Large models stigmatizing
    stamilhstgr0518@gmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    The pitfalls of using social media and AI for health decisions, according to a doctor

    July 11, 2026

    Better tuberculosis treatment starts with a better test

    July 11, 2026

    Staying safe in the summer heat

    July 11, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Health
    Lifestyle

    GoodHeart | Come Alive aims to bring Clifton boys back home

    By stamilhstgr0518@gmail.comJuly 11, 20260

    The Come Alive Collective came together for a group photo at the launch in May. (Back row, left) Matthew Edwards, production manager; Eric Hosin, chairman and executive event producer; Johnathan Fletcher, social media manager; and Dexter Johnson, assistant production manager. Front row (from left) are Kishauna Livingstone, sponsorship coordinator; Judene Edwards, secretariat; Shanique Dixon, food and vendor liaison; Kimberly Smalling, venue and logistics lead; Trudie-Ann Morgan, secretariat; and Amoy A. Lawrence, media and public relations manager.

    The pitfalls of using social media and AI for health decisions, according to a doctor

    July 11, 2026

    UK Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity guidelines

    July 11, 2026

    Extension health experts share tips for supporting brain hea…

    July 11, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Fitness

    Opinion: The FDA must put biotech at its center or continue to cede early research to China

    July 6, 2026

    Inside Elevance’s digital chronic disease management strategy

    July 6, 2026

    Best, Worst States For Well

    July 6, 2026

    What do the Middle Ages tell us about mental health then and now? VCU historian Leigh Ann Craig has answers

    July 6, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us

    Welcome to HealthyLife7.com, your trusted source for reliable health, wellness, fitness, and lifestyle information. Our mission is to help people make informed decisions about their health by providing clear, practical, and easy-to-understand content.

    At HealthyLife7.com, we believe that good health starts with the right knowledge. Whether you're looking for healthy eating tips, fitness advice, mental wellness strategies, weight management guidance, or information about common health conditions, our goal is to deliver valuable content that supports a healthier lifestyle.

    Fitness

    GoodHeart | Come Alive aims to bring Clifton boys back home

    July 11, 2026

    The pitfalls of using social media and AI for health decisions, according to a doctor

    July 11, 2026

    UK Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity guidelines

    July 11, 2026
    Health

    Opinion: The FDA must put biotech at its center or continue to cede early research to China

    July 6, 2026

    Inside Elevance’s digital chronic disease management strategy

    July 6, 2026

    Best, Worst States For Well

    July 6, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 healthylife7.com. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.