Almost every piece of food waste advice I have read sells one habit as the answer, and the habit changes depending on who is doing the selling: shop with a list, freeze the herbs in oil, buy the ugly produce, date-label every container in the refrigerator. Each one is reasonable on its own and I have tried most of them at one point or another, which is why a finding in the newest household research from ReFED stopped me on the first read
ReFED is a nonprofit that measures food waste in the United States, and in January 2026 it worked with YouGov to survey a nationally representative sample of 1,000 households about their finances, their grocery spending, and what they do with food once it is home, including how much they thought they were throwing out compared with the year before. The result that matters is not any one habit but the pile of them, because households that made several small changes at once, rather than any single change on its own, were 8 to 11 percentage points more likely to report wasting less food, and the size of that gap depended on whether their grocery spending had gone up or down over the year. ReFED published the finding in a July 2026 write-up of the report, and the methodology sits on the report’s own page.
The changes ReFED points to in its write-up are ordinary to the point of being dull, and it names them as examples rather than as the whole list: cutting back on non-essentials, checking what is already at home before shopping, cooking and eating at home more often, and using leftovers more. None of those is a system and I would guess most people reading this already do at least one of them. What makes the finding useful is that the changes appear to add up rather than compete. BioCycle, reporting on the same study, put it in per-change terms: among the households spending more on groceries, each additional change corresponded to roughly an 8 percent increase in the probability of reporting less waste, and the households that had adopted three or more changes were at least 24 percent more likely to report wasting less food. ReFED adds a note I keep thinking about, which is that households under greater financial pressure reported fewer changes, but for them each change came with a greater probability of reporting less waste, so helping that group adopt even one or two more could matter out of proportion to the effort.
The number behind the whole category
ReFED estimates 60 million tons of food waste in the United States in 2024, which is a quarter of all the food in the country, at a value of $325 billion. The wider category it tracks, surplus food, takes in everything that goes unsold or uneaten anywhere in the chain, including what gets donated or fed to animals, and that came to roughly 70 million tons, about 29 percent of a food supply of 240 million tons. Those figures come from ReFED’s page explaining what it measures and from its April 2026 report announcement, and the difference between the two categories is worth keeping straight. Surplus is the bigger bucket, covering everything that never gets eaten by the person who was supposed to eat it. Waste is the part of that which goes to a waste destination instead, and ReFED counts eight of them, among them landfill, composting, the sewer, and a crop never harvested at all.
The tonnage moved too, but it is a different measurement
Total surplus food fell 2.2 percent from 2023, which ReFED calls the first year-to-year reduction in the total amount of food that goes unsold or uneaten since a COVID-19 pandemic-related dip. Homes did the heaviest lifting inside that, with residential food waste dropping by nearly 950,000 tons. ReFED’s president, Dana Gunders, ended her statement in the group’s April 2026 announcement with “The wind is at our backs, and it’s time to step on the gas.”
Advertisement
The tonnage estimate and the household survey are not the same measurement and I do not want to fuse them. The tonnage is an estimate for 2024. The survey was fielded in January 2026 and asked people about the twelve months behind them, so it describes a later stretch of time and cannot be the explanation for a decline measured before it. What the two have in common is a direction, and what the survey adds is the reason people picked when they were asked
What the survey says was behind the changes people reported
The reason people gave for their own changes is not a sudden attack of conscience, and ReFED does not pretend otherwise. BioCycle reported that 58 percent of households said their grocery spending had risen over the past year and that 93 percent of those households blamed food prices for it, with the median household reporting about $50 more a week. In ReFED’s own numbers, measured against households whose grocery spending had not changed at all, households whose spending had risen were 29 percent more likely to report cutting their waste and households whose spending had fallen were 40 percent more likely. Among only the households whose spending moved in either direction, the ones who said food prices were the reason were 17 percent more likely to report cutting waste than the ones who named some other cause.
That is not quite the tidy story of a long receipt waking everybody up, because the households whose bill fell were the likeliest of the three groups to report cutting waste, and a survey taken at one moment cannot tell you which came first, since a household that wastes less is also a household buying less. What the numbers do show is that a grocery bill which moved at all, in either direction, went along with saying you wasted less, and that inside that group the households naming prices as the reason were likelier to say it than the households naming something else. I do not find that cynical, and I think money is about the most reliable motivation there is, because it is the one that survives a busy week.
What stacking looks like in a real kitchen
The habit I would start with is the one that costs nothing and takes about ninety seconds, which is opening the refrigerator and looking before the grocery list gets written. I cannot tell you what that habit is worth on its own once you hold the others steady, and I am not sure that is the interesting question anyway. I think its real job is to feed the habits that come after it, because once you know there is half a bag of frozen green beans, a container of shredded chicken, and two cans of beans in the cupboard, the meal that uses them writes itself, and you have skipped the part where you buy a third can of beans.
Advertisement
The second habit is keeping a couple of recipes that are built to absorb whatever the first one turns up. That is a different thing from a recipe you like. It means a dish whose ingredient list has slots in it rather than a fixed cast, so what is already in the freezer can go in without the recipe falling apart
Chicken vegetable soup is the clearest one I have. It calls for 12 to 16 ounces of frozen vegetables, which is a range rather than a number on purpose, along with two cans of Northern beans, canned diced and crushed tomatoes, chicken stock, and a pound of cooked shredded chicken that goes in near the end. Eight servings, thirty-five minutes, and almost every ingredient is something already sitting in a freezer or a cupboard waiting to be used before it is too old to bother with
Green chile chicken with leftover shredded chicken thighs puts the whole idea in its own title. It starts from five cups of chicken that is already cooked and stirs it into a sauce of cheddar, cream cheese, heavy cream, whole milk, and a can of green chiles built right in a cast-iron skillet, with more cheddar melted over the top, and it gets six servings on the table in twenty minutes. A recipe that begins with cooked chicken is not a lesser recipe, and I would put that dinner up against anything I make from raw.
Slow cooker split pea soup turns a leftover into the point of the meal. The card asks for two cups of cubed ham and says outright that store-bought, leftover, or one meaty ham bone all work, then runs on high for four to six hours after the peas soak overnight, or on low for eight to ten with no soak at all. Ten servings built mostly on a bag of dried peas and the end of a ham is about as much dinner as a cupboard can be made to produce
Advertisement
The third habit is the one that decides whether any of it happens, and it is doing a version of this before the week starts rather than at six o’clock on a Wednesday. Washing and cutting whatever will go bad first is most of the work, and I wrote a guide on meal-prepping vegetables that walks through it
One honest caveat
The waste numbers in the survey are what people said about their own kitchens, not what anybody weighed out of a trash can, so they measure belief as much as behavior, and a household that has started paying attention is a household more likely to think it is doing better. ReFED’s own description of the survey is careful about that, calling the measure self-reported. The tonnage figures are a separate exercise covering an earlier year, which means they are not a check on these answers, and I am not going to present them as one.
So the useful version of all this is not another single tip to add to the pile. Look at what is already in the refrigerator before you write the list, keep two or three recipes on hand that can eat whatever you find in there, and do the cutting and washing on a day when nobody is hungry yet. The first of those three is a change ReFED named outright, checking what is already at home before shopping, and the other two are my own way of getting at two more that it named, using leftovers and cooking at home. The part worth taking from the research is the shape: the households that said they were getting somewhere were not the ones who found the perfect habit, they were the ones running several at once.
Creators are not employed by Yahoo. Views expressed by creators do not reflect the opinions and position of Yahoo.Learn how to become a creator.
