Close Menu
healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Medicare’s New GLP-1 Bridge: Weight-Loss Help for $50 a Month

    August 11, 2026

    Congo says 2,000 people have died in Ebola outbreak, the fastest growing on record

    August 11, 2026

    National Police Workforce and Wellbeing Survey results published

    August 11, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Medicare’s New GLP-1 Bridge: Weight-Loss Help for $50 a Month
    • Congo says 2,000 people have died in Ebola outbreak, the fastest growing on record
    • National Police Workforce and Wellbeing Survey results published
    • COURT WATCH: Judge Orders Accused Man to Attend Preliminary Hearing in Person Despite Health Conditions
    • Chrissy Metz reveals GLP-1 use after dramatic 100 lbs weight loss transformation
    • This Fitness Metric May Be The Most Overlooked Predictor Of Heart Disease
    • The Medicare for all trade-offs socialists aren’t talking about, according to experts
    • As GLP-1 frenzy grips India, firms race to build businesses around the weight-loss drug boom
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com
    • Home
    • Fitness
    • Health
    • Nutrition
    • Lifestyle
    • Conditions
    • Mental Health
    • Weight Loss
    • Wellness Tips
    Tuesday, August 11
    healthylife7.comhealthylife7.com
    Home»Wellness Tips»Identification of critical brain regions for young adults with obesity and their relationships with impulsivity using machine learning based on neuroanatomical features
    Wellness Tips

    Identification of critical brain regions for young adults with obesity and their relationships with impulsivity using machine learning based on neuroanatomical features

    healthylife7By healthylife7August 11, 2026No Comments10 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Identification of critical brain regions for young adults with obesity and their relationships with impulsivity using machine learning based on neuroanatomical features
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

    Abstract

    Background

    Prior obesity neuroimaging studies used univariate methods and small samples, limiting reproducibility. Employing a large-scale dataset and a two-stage machine learning framework, we identified neuroanatomical signatures of obesity and evaluated their population-level associations with delay discounting impulsivity

    Methods

    We enrolled 243 young adults with obesity and 475 healthy-weight controls from the Human Connectome Project S1200 dataset. Cortical surface area, cortical thickness, and subcortical gray matter volume were extracted using surface-based morphometry. Support vector machine (SVM) classifiers discriminated obesity from healthy weight based on neuroanatomical features, with interpretability assessed via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Partial correlations evaluated associations between the 15 SVM-selected features and the area under the curve (AUC) of delay discounting (DD) in the full sample. Normative modeling examined if the obesity group deviated from brain-structure-based expectations of AUC-DD.

    Results

    The neuroanatomical-only SVM achieved a receiver operating characteristic (ROC-AUC) of 0.648; adding demographic and cognitive covariates improved it to 0.740. SHAP highlighted the superior parietal, entorhinal, medial orbitofrontal, posterior cingulate, and rostral anterior cingulate cortices. Ten of the top 15 features were significantly associated with AUC-DD, and all in the expected direction. The obesity group showed systematically higher DD impulsivity than predicted impulsivity by brain structures alone.

    Conclusions

    Distributed neuroanatomical features in prefrontal, medial temporal, cingulate, and parietal cortices discriminated obesity and showed convergent population-level associations with delay discounting impulsivity across group, correlational, and normative analyses

    This is a preview of subscription content, access

    Access options

    Access through your institution

    • Purchase on SpringerLink
    • Instant access to the full article PDF.

    39,95 €

    Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

    Fig. 1
    Fig. 2: The combined model shows superior classification accuracy over the neuroanatomical model.
    Fig. 3: Frontoparietal and temporal cortical features are the primary contributors to both classification models.
    Fig. 4: Model explanation by the SHAP method.
    Fig. 5: Normative modeling deviation of delay discounting (AUC-DD) in the obesity group.

    Data availability

    All data were provided by the Human Connectome Project, WU-Minn Consortium (Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil; 1U54MH091657) funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research; and by the McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University in St. Louis. The authors are grateful to the Human Connectome Project for open access to its data. The HCP S1200 data are publicly available at https://www.humanconnectome.org/. Analysis code is available at https://github.com/HuiXu-Eric/Identification-of-critical-brain-rigions-for-HCP-s1200.

    References

    1. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Quick V, Koenings M, Martin-Biggers J, Kattelmann KK. Relationships of cognitive load on eating and weight-related behaviors of young adults. Eat Behav. 2016;21:89–94

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    2. Phelps NH, Singleton RK, Zhou B, Heap RA, Mishra A, Bennett JE, et al. Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2024;403:1027–50

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    3. Riva G. Out of my real body: cognitive neuroscience meets eating disorders. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:236

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    4. Simmons WK, DeVille DC. Interoceptive contributions to healthy eating and obesity. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;17:106–12

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    5. Pannacciulli N, Del Parigi A, Chen K, Le DSNT, Reiman EM, Tataranni PA. Brain abnormalities in human obesity: a voxel-based morphometric study. NeuroImage. 2006;31:1419–25

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    6. Raji CA, Ho AJ, Parikshak NN, Becker JT, Lopez OL, Kuller LH, et al. Brain structure and obesity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010;31:353–64

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    7. Weise CM, Bachmann T, Pleger B. Brain structural differences in monozygotic twins discordant for body mass index. Neuroimage. 2019;201:116006

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    8. Stoeckel LE, Weller RE, Cook EW 3rd, Twieg DB, Knowlton RC, et al. Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods. Neuroimage. 2008;41:636–47

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    9. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Thanos PK, Logan J, et al. Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors. Neuroimage. 2008;42:1537–43

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    10. Stice E, Spoor S, Bohon C, Veldhuizen MG, Small DM. Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008;117:924–35

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    11. Burger K, Stice E. Relation of dietary restraint scores to activation of reward-related brain regions in response to food intake, anticipated intake, and food pictures. Neuroimage. 2011;55:233–9

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    12. Xu H, Owens MM, MacKillop J. Neuroanatomical profile of BMI implicates impulsive delay discounting and general cognitive ability. Obesity. 2023;31:2799–808

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    13. Genc A, Arican E. Obesity classification: a comparative study of machine learning models excluding weight and height data. Rev Da Assoc Med Bras. 2025;71:e20241282

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    14. Gutiérrez-Gallego A, Zamorano-León J, Parra-Rodríguez D, Zekri-Nechar K, Velasco J, Garnica O, et al. Combination of machine learning techniques to predict overweight/obesity in adults. J Personalized Med. 2024;14:816

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    15. Allen B. An interpretable machine learning model of cross-sectional US county-level obesity prevalence using explainable artificial intelligence. Plos One. 2023;18:e0292341

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    16. García-García I, Michaud A, Dadar M, Zeighami Y, Neseliler S, Collins DL, et al. Neuroanatomical differences in obesity: meta-analytic findings and their validation in an independent dataset. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019;43:943–51

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    17. Van Essen DC, Ugurbil K, Auerbach E, Barch D, Behrens TEJ, Bucholz R, et al. The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective. NeuroImage. 2012;62:2222–31

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    18. Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, Behrens TEJ, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K. The WU-minn human connectome project: an overview. NeuroImage. 2013;80:62–79

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    19. Xu S, Lv K, Sun Y, Chen T, He J, Xu J, et al. Altered structural node of default mode network mediated general cognitive ability in young adults with obesity. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2024;135:111132

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    20. He J, Xu G, Zhao J, Wang Y, Lou C, Wu S, et al. Sex-related difference of subcortical gray matter volume associated with crystallized intelligence in young adults with obesity. Biol Sex Differ. 2026;17:62

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    21. Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:11050–5

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    22. Zhang H, Bi Y, Hou X, Lu X, Tu Y, Hu L. The role of negative emotions in sex differences in pain sensitivity. NeuroImage. 2021;245:118685

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    23. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage. 2006;31:968–80

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    24. Xu H, Xu C, Xu J. Altered gray matter structural covariance networks in young adults with obesity. Int J Obes. 2025;49:801–8

      Article 
      Google Scholar 

    25. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017

    26. Odum AL. Delay discounting: I’M A K, YOU’RE A K. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011;96:427–39

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    27. Amlung M, Petker T, Jackson J, Balodis I, MacKillop J. Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2016;46:2423–34

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    28. Peters J, Büchel C. The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:227–39

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    29. Wesley MJ, Bickel WK. Remember the future II: Meta-analyses and functional overlap of working memory and delay discounting. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75:435–48

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    30. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Tomasi D, Baler RD. Obesity and addiction: neurobiological overlaps. Obes Rev. 2013;14:2–18

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    31. Brooks SJ, Cedernaes J, Schiöth HB. Increased prefrontal and parahippocampal activation with reduced dorsolateral prefrontal and insular cortex activation to food images in obesity: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e60393

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    32. Vainik U, Baker TE, Dadar M, Zeighami Y, Michaud A, Zhang Y, et al. Neurobehavioral correlates of obesity are largely heritable. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:9312–7

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    33. Garzón B, Kurth-Nelson Z, Bäckman L, Nyberg L, Guitart-Masip M. Investigating associations of delay discounting with brain structure, working memory, and episodic memory. Cereb Cortex. 2023;33:1669–78

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    34. Owens MM, Gray JC, Amlung MT, Oshri A, Sweet LH, MacKillop J. Neuroanatomical foundations of delayed reward discounting decision making. Neuroimage. 2017;161:261–70

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    35. Chen L, Zhao S, Wang Y, Niu X, Zhang B, Li X., et al. Genetic insights into obesity and brain: combine Mendelian randomization study and gene expression analysis. Brain Sci. 2023;13:892

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    36. Blanke O. Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:556–71

      Article 
      CAS 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    37. Yang H, Wang S, Li H, Gu S, Zhang F, Wang H, et al. Mapping gray matter changes in anorexia nervosa: a functional connectivity network approach. Front Nutr. 2025;12:1667729

      Article 
      PubMed 
      PubMed Central 
      Google Scholar 

    38. Feusner JD, Townsend J, Bystritsky A, Bookheimer S. Visual information processing of faces in body dysmorphic disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:1417–25

      Article 
      PubMed 
      Google Scholar 

    Download references

    Acknowledgements

    We thank the Human Connectome Project for sharing this dataset for this study

    Funding

    This study was funded by Philosophy and Social Sciences Foundation of Zhejiang Province (26NDJC115YB), and Basic Research Fund Grant Projects of Wenzhou Medical University (KYYW202541)

    Author information

    Author notes

    1. These authors contributed equally: Guanjinghui Xu, Junhao He, Junjie Zhao

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

      Guanjinghui Xu, Junhao He, Junjie Zhao & Yang Wang

    2. The Affiliated Kangning Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Mental Health, Wenzhou, China

      Hui Xu

    3. Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Huzhou, China

      Hui Xu

    Authors

    1. Guanjinghui XuView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Junhao HeView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Junjie ZhaoView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yang WangView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Hui XuView author publications

      Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

    Contributions

    GX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing—reviewing and editing; JH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing—original draft; JZ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing—original draft; YW: Methodology, Writing—original draft; HX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Investigation, Supervision, Funding, Writing—original draft, Writing—reviewing and editing

    Ethics declarations

    Competing interests

    The authors declare no competing interests

    Ethical approval

    This study was a secondary analysis of de-identified, publicly available data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) S1200 release. Ethical approval for the original HCP data collection was obtained by the HCP consortium from the Institutional Review Board at Washington University in St. Louis (IRB #201204036). Ethical approval for this secondary analysis was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Wenzhou Medical University

    Informed consent

    All participants provided written informed consent as part of the original HCP protocol approved by the Washington University IRB. No additional consent procedures were conducted for this secondary analysis. Ethics approval and consent to participate. This study was approved and consented by the Ethics Committee of Wenzhou Medical University in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (approval number: 2026100)

    Additional information

    Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

    Supplementary information

    SupplementalMaterials (download DOCX )

    Rights and permissions

    Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Xu, G., He, J., Zhao, J. et al. Identification of critical brain regions for young adults with obesity and their relationships with impulsivity using machine learning based on neuroanatomical features.
    Int J Obes (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-026-02184-2

    • Received:09 March 2026

    • Revised:22 July 2026

    • Accepted:31 July 2026

    • Published:11 August 2026

    • Version of record:11 August 2026

    • DOI
      :https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-026-02184-2

    brain critical identification regions young
    healthylife7
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Medicare’s New GLP-1 Bridge: Weight-Loss Help for $50 a Month

    August 11, 2026

    As GLP-1 frenzy grips India, firms race to build businesses around the weight-loss drug boom

    August 11, 2026

    How ‘popcorn brain’ can create challenges in the classroom

    August 11, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Health
    Wellness Tips

    Medicare’s New GLP-1 Bridge: Weight-Loss Help for $50 a Month

    By healthylife7August 11, 20260

    Medicare’s New GLP-1 Bridge: Weight-Loss Help for $50 a Month – Daily Independent Skip to main content Log in SPONSORED CONTENT

    Congo says 2,000 people have died in Ebola outbreak, the fastest growing on record

    August 11, 2026

    National Police Workforce and Wellbeing Survey results published

    August 11, 2026

    COURT WATCH: Judge Orders Accused Man to Attend Preliminary Hearing in Person Despite Health Conditions

    August 11, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Fitness

    Opinion: The FDA must put biotech at its center or continue to cede early research to China

    July 6, 2026

    Inside Elevance’s digital chronic disease management strategy

    July 6, 2026

    Best, Worst States For Well

    July 6, 2026

    What do the Middle Ages tell us about mental health then and now? VCU historian Leigh Ann Craig has answers

    July 6, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us

    Welcome to HealthyLife7.com, your trusted source for reliable health, wellness, fitness, and lifestyle information. Our mission is to help people make informed decisions about their health by providing clear, practical, and easy-to-understand content.

    At HealthyLife7.com, we believe that good health starts with the right knowledge. Whether you're looking for healthy eating tips, fitness advice, mental wellness strategies, weight management guidance, or information about common health conditions, our goal is to deliver valuable content that supports a healthier lifestyle.

    Fitness

    Medicare’s New GLP-1 Bridge: Weight-Loss Help for $50 a Month

    August 11, 2026

    Congo says 2,000 people have died in Ebola outbreak, the fastest growing on record

    August 11, 2026

    National Police Workforce and Wellbeing Survey results published

    August 11, 2026
    Health

    Opinion: The FDA must put biotech at its center or continue to cede early research to China

    July 6, 2026

    Inside Elevance’s digital chronic disease management strategy

    July 6, 2026

    Best, Worst States For Well

    July 6, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 healthylife7.com. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.