Key points
- Trichotillomania (repeated hair-pulling) and excoriation disorder (repeated skin-picking) can run in families and aren’t just “bad habits.”
- A Yale study with 100+ families found that people with these disorders often inherited more genetic risk linked to obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD)—even if they don’t have OCD.
- Some had rare DNA changes seen in other brain-related conditions; bigger, more diverse studies are needed to learn more.
Two disorders with big names—trichotillomania (repeated hair-pulling) and excoriation disorder (repeated skin-picking)—were the focus of a recent Yale study looking at potential genetic causes. The two disorders are part of a group called body-focused repetitive behaviors, or BFRBs
These are more than “bad habits”—they can cause distress, shame, and pain. They can also disrupt life at school, work, and home. According to the study’s authors, roughly 1–3% of people are affected by these BFRBs. These conditions often run in families, suggesting that genes may play a role—but exactly how hasn’t been clear
Emily Olfson, MD, PhD, assistant professor at Yale Child Study Center, is the corresponding author of the research study, which was designed to clarify what kinds of genetic factors might contribute to BFRBs
The study also examined whether BFRBs share genetic risk with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Hair-pulling and skin-picking are grouped with obsessive-compulsive related disorders because they share symptoms and often occur together. Study findings were published in Translational Psychiatry in June 2026
Data collection
Olfson and study co-authors Samantha Greenspun and Thomas Fernandez, MD, describe their study in a blog post for the research community titled, ‘What families can teach us about the genetics of hair-pulling and skin-picking.’
They used a family-based approach called parent–child trios. This means they collected DNA from a child (or adult offspring) with one of the disorders and both biological parents. Then they asked: Are certain genetic risk factors passed down to affected offspring more often than expected by chance?
More than 100 families participated in the study. Participants were recruited in several ways, including through The TLC Foundation for BFRB community, clinics, online outreach, and previous study participants
“These recruitment efforts allowed us to meet many families affected by these conditions,” the authors note. They add, “Talking with these families reinforced our commitment to better understand the causes of these understudied and often difficult-to-treat BFRBs.”
Study findings
Common genetic risk linked to OCD was “over-transmitted” to people with BFRBs
The study found that people with BFRBs were more likely than expected to inherit something called a higher OCD polygenic score from their parents. The authors clarify that this is not a “BFRB gene.” It’s a single number that summarizes the tiny effects of many common genetic differences, each nudging risk a little. This “extra” inheritance of OCD-related genetic risk showed up even when the person with BFRBs did not also have OCD. In other words, shared biology may exist beyond just having both diagnoses.
Some people with BFRBs had rare DNA changes previously linked to neurodevelopmental conditions
They also identified something unusual in some people with BFRBs—rare copy number variants (CNVs). These are stretches of DNA that are missing or duplicated. Some of these CNVs have been seen before in neurodevelopmental conditions. Several affected genes also relate to how brain cells form connections. The authors note that some genes involved “help neurons build and organize their connections.” This aligns with broader evidence that synapse-related biology may matter in these behaviors
Impact for parents and families
For families of children and teens dealing with trichotillomania or excoriation disorder, it’s important to remember that these are real, impairing health conditions. It’s also now clear that there is a biological component. Research is starting to map out what that biology may look like
In short, the conditions and behaviors can have inherited risk—without being anyone’s fault. They are not caused by poor parenting or lack of willpower. It is also important to note that a genetic link does not equate to destiny. The study authors stress that these conditions likely reflect a mix of influences, including common genetic factors, rare genetic factors, and environment
The authors consider this study a starting point, not the final answer. The findings may help families by:
- Reducing blame and shame: The findings support that BFRBs aren’t simply “attention-seeking,” laziness, or bad parenting. Biology can influence risk.
- Explaining why kidscan’t “just stop”: If many small genetic factors (and sometimes rare ones) influence risk, willpower alone is rarely enough.
- Supportingappropriate care early: Even though this is genetics research (not a new treatment yet), it strengthens the case that these are legitimate disorders deserving evidence-based support.
Next steps & future directions
The authors argue that larger and more diverse studies are needed. Future research should combine DNA sequencing, careful clinical assessments, and long-term follow-up. This may help clarify causes and (eventually) guide better treatments. They also highlight issues related to representation. Broader recruitment is essential since psychiatric genetics has historically overrepresented people of European ancestry
Finally, the authors center the role of participating families, noting, “This research would not have been possible without the families affected by trichotillomania and excoriation disorder who generously shared their time and experiences.”
Article outro
Author
The research in this news article was supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (K08MH128665, R01MH114927, T32MH18268, and R25MH077823), the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the Alan B. Slifka Foundation Riva Ariella Ritvo endowment, the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (TL1TR001864), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5T32NS041228-24), Yale University, and Yale Child Study Center. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
